Degradome sequencing for identification of miRNA targets in plants

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous regulators of a broad range of physiological processes and act by either degrading mRNA or blocking its translation. Mature miRNAs function within large complexes to negatively regulate specific target mRNAs. Plant miRNAs generally interact with their targets through perfect or near-perfect complementarity and direct mRNA target degradation.

In plants, miRNAs not only post-transcriptionally regulate their own targets but also interact with each other in regulatory networks to affect many aspects of development, such as growth, development and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Hundreds of miRNAs have been identified in higher plants by direct cloning or more recently by next-gen sequencing. To determine the function of these miRNAs we must first identify their targets.

Originally, plant miRNA targets have been studied via computational prediction, which is based on either perfect or near-perfect sequence complementarity between miRNA and the target mRNA or sequence conservation among different species. However, target prediction is very challenging, especially when a high level of mismatches exists in miRNA:target pairing.

Recently, a new method called degradome sequencing, which combines high-throughput RNA sequencing with bioinformatic tools, has-been successfully established to screen for miRNA targets in plants. Using degradome sequencing, many of the previously validated and predicted targets of miRNAs have been verified indicating that it is an efficient strategy to identify smRNA targets on a large scale in plants.

Degradome sequencing reveals miRNA targets by globally identifying the remnants of small RNA-directed target cleavage by sequencing the 5′ ends of uncapped RNAs. Sequencing reads are mapped to mRNAs and the 5′ terminal nucleotide of miRNA-cleaved mRNA fragments corresponds to the nucleotide that is complementary to the 10th nucleotide of the miRNA. Therefore, the cleaved RNA targets have distinct peaks in the degradome sequence reads at the predicted cleavage site relative to other regions of the transcript. Confirmed miRNA targets are presented in the form of target plots (t-plots).

t-plots

Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) is one of the most important crops in China, Europe and other Asian countries with publicly available expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and genomic survey sequence (GSS) databases. However, unlike Arabidopsis and other plants, much less is known about its miRNAs and their targets. Now, researchers at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing have used Illumina high-throughput sequencing analysis of small RNAs as well as degradome sequencing of B. napus to identify novel miRNAs and miRNA targets1.

Forty-one conserved B. napus miRNAs and 62candidate novel B. napus-specific miRNAs were identified through small RNA sequencing and further verified by real-time RT-PCR. A total of 33 non-redundant target ESTs for 25conserved miRNAs, and 19 non-redundant target ESTs for 17 B. napus-specific miRNAs were identified through degradome sequencing and verified by RNA ligase-mediated 5’RACE mapping. This study describes large scale sequencing and identification of B. napus miRNAs and their potential targets, providing the foundation for further characterization of miRNA function in the regulation of diverse physiological processes in B. napus.

miRNAs also play important regulatory roles in development and stress response in plants. Wild soybean (Glycine soja) has undergone long-term natural selection and may have evolved special mechanisms to survive stress conditions as a result. However, little information about miRNAs especially miRNAs responsive to aluminum (Al) stress is available in wild soybean.

Now, researchers at the South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou have sequenced two small RNA libraries and two degradomelibraries constructed from the roots of Al-treated and Al-free G. soja seedlings2. Among all the identified miRNAs, the expressions of 30 miRNAs were responsive to Al stress. Through degradome sequencing, 86 genes were identified as targets of the known miRNAs and five genes were found to be the targets of the novel miRNAs obtained in this study. Gene ontology (GO) annotations of target transcripts indicated that 52 target genes cleaved by conserved miRNA families might play roles in the regulation of transcription. Additionally, some genes known to be responsive to stress, were found to be cleaved under Al stress conditions. These findings provide valuable information to understand the function of miRNAs in Al tolerance.

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) is among the most important greenhouse species in the world, but only a limited number of miRNAs from cucumber have been identified and the experimental validation of the related miRNA targets is still lacking. In this study, a team led by researchers at Zhejiang University, Hangzhou constructed two independent small RNA libraries from cucumber leaves and roots, respectively, and sequenced them with the high-throughput Illumina system3. Based on sequence similarity and hairpin structure prediction, a total of 29 known miRNA families and 2 novel miRNA families containing a total of 64 miRNA were identified.

With the recently developed ‘high throughput degradome sequencing’ approach, 21 target mRNAs of known miRNAs were identified for the first time in cucumber. These targets were associated with development, reactive oxygen species scavenging, signaling transduction and transcriptional regulation. This study provides an overview of miRNA expression profile and interaction between miRNA and target, which will help further understanding of the important roles of miRNAs in cucumber plants.

  1. Xu MY, Dong Y, Zhang QX, Zhang L, Luo YZ, Sun J, Fan YL, Wang L. (2012) Identification of miRNAs and their targets from Brassica napus by high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. BMC Genomics 13:421. [article]
  2. Qiao-Ying Z, Cun-Yi Y, Qi-Bin M, Xiu-Ping L, Wen-Wen D, Hai N. (2012) Identification of wild soybean miRNAs and their target genes responsive to aluminum stress. BMC Plant Biol 12(1), 182. [article]
  3. Mao W, Li Z, Xia X, Li Y, Yu J. (2012) A Combined Approach of High-Throughput Sequencing and Degradome Analysis Reveals Tissue Specific Expression of MicroRNAs and Their Targets in Cucumber. PLoS One 7(3), e33040. [article]

Incoming search terms:

  • degradome
  • rna degradome
  • degradome sequencing ppt
  • deep sequencing of degradome libraries illumina
  • degradome software
  • heatmap mirna seq\ r
  • High-throughput degradomesequencing can be used to gain insights into microR
  • illumina degradome sequencing
  • ion torrent for degradome analysis
  • pepline of miRNA degradome sequencing

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Social Networking Pages

    Linkedin Group

  • Follow Me on Pinterest
  • RSS SEQanswers – RNA Sequencing

    • The Transcript Length from Cufflinks May 25, 2013
      Hi Guys, I'm doing a fungus RNA-Seq.However, the merged transcriptome gave me very long transcripts (generally >2K). I used GeneMarES to do... […]
      hchang10
    • DESeq; can I omit timepoints during dispersal estimation? May 24, 2013
      I have a bacterial timecourse with 2 biological replicates per timepoint. There is a fair bit of variance between my replicates. I have spent the... […]
      amcloon
    • HT Seq Count stranded options May 24, 2013
      I am very new to bioinformatics, so I would be really grateful for some help! I have been using *HTSeq Count v0.5.3* and I am bit confused about... […]
      qwrissie
    • Tophat 2.0.8b installation error May 24, 2013
      I install tophat-2.0.8b to rerun the mapping. but when i make it, the error appears like this. make[1]: Entering directory... […]
      canhu
    • reason for low mapping rate?? May 23, 2013
      we did RNASeq using HiSeq 2000 100PE. When the data were back, I mapping them to the reference sequence, but got very low mapping rate (30-40%). I... […]
      miaom
    • cross-species data - questions about normalization May 23, 2013
      Hi, I have some data form various samples (cell types) in different species. I want to compare and analyze gene expression variability across the... […]
      trelek2
  • RSS Biostar – RNA-Seq

    • Why am I getting so many unmapped reads in STAR, classified as "too short"?
      I am currently using STAR to map several Hi-SEQ mRNA runs. I'm having trouble getting a decent amount of reads to map, but I don't really understand why. I'm hoping you can shed some light :) In the final log, only about 50% (or less) of the reads map to the reference. I'm using a GTF in addition to the genome. The unmapped bin that most […]
    • What are the best practices for SNP identification in RNA seq transcriptome data
      I have 20 RICE RNA seq tranascriptome data hiseq 2000 platform paired end reads. I aligned fasta reads with BWA and remove PCR duplicates with PICARD. Later I call SNP with samtools using various parameters. I would like to clarify what parameters should I used while alinging to reference rice genome for looking SNP location 100 bp upstream and 250 bp downst […]
    • How do TopHat options -g , --supress-hits, and Bowtie options interplay?
      Hi, I am currently using TopHat2 to map RNA-seq runs. I think there have been some changes pertaining the -g option. Does anyone know how it works now? I used to think that setting -g would look for n alignments for a given read, report them [if top-scoring] and discard those reads that had more than g [top scoring] alignments. Now, the description sounds mo […]
    • What happened to -k in TopHat for multiple-mapping reads?
      Selecting -g n in tophat does not discard reads mapping more than n, but instead only reports n alignments for those out all all their TOP scoring alignments. I think there used to be an option -k that would allow one to discard reads that topped x alignments -- whatever happened to that? I only see -g in the tophat 2 manual, no reporting options like before […]
    • Does tophat use the library-type information for mapping, or just for the XS flag?
      When I specify library-type to TopHat, i.e., first-strand, second-strand, unstranded, TopHat appends a value + or - to the XS:A flag, which is useful for subsequent analyses, such as annotation. However, does this information actually influence the "mappability" of reads, or is this unaffected? My thinking is that the information would be considere […]
    • Purpose of Y-shaped adapters in Illumina Sequencing?
      Hi all, Y adapters different sequences to be annealed to the 5' and 3' ends of each molecule in a library. The arms of the Y are unique, and the middle part, connected to the DNA fragment, is complementary. What are the advantages of this? My take of this over having fully-complementary adapters (ADAPTER1 - - - - - ADAPTER1) is that: -Upon primer a […]