May

29

RNA-Seq to Study Epigenetics of Obesity

Filed Under Press Release 

from the Houston Chronicle

Hangzhou, China (PRWEB) May 29, 2012 – In a new study published online in Nature Communications, researchers from Sichuan Agricultural University and LC Sciences report the miRNAome in porcine adipose and muscle tissues. The report provides a valuable epigenomic source for obesity prediction and prevention and furthers the development of pig as a model organism for human obesity research.

Scientists now know that the genetic code alone isn’t responsible for adult phenotype or even the offspring of these adults. Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression affecting phenotype that don’t involve changes to the DNA nucleotide sequence itself, and yet are heritable. DNA methylation, histone modification and microRNA (miRNA) expression are examples of epigenetic mechanisms that have recently been identified as important regulators of gene expression in many biological systems.

Obesity is a huge problem worldwide. Recently, the World Health Organization reported that obesity levels doubled in every region of the world between 1980 and 2008, spurring rates of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and cancer that now account for almost two out of three deaths globally. It has become evident that epigenetic factors, such as DNA methylation and miRNA expression, have essential roles in obesity development. (read more…)

  • Li, M. et al. (2012)An atlas of DNA methylomes in porcine adipose and muscle tissues. Nat Commun[Epub ahead of print]. [abstract]

 

Incoming search terms:

  • serum microRNA
  • mrna seq
  • rna seq flow chart
  • can u use RNA sequencing for epigeentics
  • rna-sequencing (rna-seq) epigenetics
  • rna-seq obesity
  • RNA-seq for epigenetics
  • rna seq epigentic
  • rna seq epigenetics
  • epigenetics rna-seq

Comments

One Response to “RNA-Seq to Study Epigenetics of Obesity”

  1. Amy Embly on July 9th, 2012 11:40 am

    Obesity is really one of the health problems which plaque our society these days, It is easily treatable by being more physical and of course by having a healthy diet. ;,.,,

Leave a Reply




  • Social Networking Pages

    Linkedin Group

  • Follow Me on Pinterest

  • RSS SEQanswers – RNA Sequencing

    • The Transcript Length from Cufflinks May 25, 2013
      Hi Guys, I'm doing a fungus RNA-Seq.However, the merged transcriptome gave me very long transcripts (generally >2K). I used GeneMarES to do... […]
      hchang10
    • DESeq; can I omit timepoints during dispersal estimation? May 24, 2013
      I have a bacterial timecourse with 2 biological replicates per timepoint. There is a fair bit of variance between my replicates. I have spent the... […]
      amcloon
    • HT Seq Count stranded options May 24, 2013
      I am very new to bioinformatics, so I would be really grateful for some help! I have been using *HTSeq Count v0.5.3* and I am bit confused about... […]
      qwrissie
    • Tophat 2.0.8b installation error May 24, 2013
      I install tophat-2.0.8b to rerun the mapping. but when i make it, the error appears like this. make[1]: Entering directory... […]
      canhu
    • reason for low mapping rate?? May 23, 2013
      we did RNASeq using HiSeq 2000 100PE. When the data were back, I mapping them to the reference sequence, but got very low mapping rate (30-40%). I... […]
      miaom
    • cross-species data - questions about normalization May 23, 2013
      Hi, I have some data form various samples (cell types) in different species. I want to compare and analyze gene expression variability across the... […]
      trelek2

  • RSS Biostar – RNA-Seq

    • Why am I getting so many unmapped reads in STAR, classified as "too short"?
      I am currently using STAR to map several Hi-SEQ mRNA runs. I'm having trouble getting a decent amount of reads to map, but I don't really understand why. I'm hoping you can shed some light :) In the final log, only about 50% (or less) of the reads map to the reference. I'm using a GTF in addition to the genome. The unmapped bin that most […]
    • What are the best practices for SNP identification in RNA seq transcriptome data
      I have 20 RICE RNA seq tranascriptome data hiseq 2000 platform paired end reads. I aligned fasta reads with BWA and remove PCR duplicates with PICARD. Later I call SNP with samtools using various parameters. I would like to clarify what parameters should I used while alinging to reference rice genome for looking SNP location 100 bp upstream and 250 bp downst […]
    • How do TopHat options -g , --supress-hits, and Bowtie options interplay?
      Hi, I am currently using TopHat2 to map RNA-seq runs. I think there have been some changes pertaining the -g option. Does anyone know how it works now? I used to think that setting -g would look for n alignments for a given read, report them [if top-scoring] and discard those reads that had more than g [top scoring] alignments. Now, the description sounds mo […]
    • What happened to -k in TopHat for multiple-mapping reads?
      Selecting -g n in tophat does not discard reads mapping more than n, but instead only reports n alignments for those out all all their TOP scoring alignments. I think there used to be an option -k that would allow one to discard reads that topped x alignments -- whatever happened to that? I only see -g in the tophat 2 manual, no reporting options like before […]
    • Does tophat use the library-type information for mapping, or just for the XS flag?
      When I specify library-type to TopHat, i.e., first-strand, second-strand, unstranded, TopHat appends a value + or - to the XS:A flag, which is useful for subsequent analyses, such as annotation. However, does this information actually influence the "mappability" of reads, or is this unaffected? My thinking is that the information would be considere […]
    • Purpose of Y-shaped adapters in Illumina Sequencing?
      Hi all, Y adapters different sequences to be annealed to the 5' and 3' ends of each molecule in a library. The arms of the Y are unique, and the middle part, connected to the DNA fragment, is complementary. What are the advantages of this? My take of this over having fully-complementary adapters (ADAPTER1 - - - - - ADAPTER1) is that: -Upon primer a […]