The characteristic direction: a geometrical approach to identify differentially expressed genes

Identifying differentially expressed genes (DEG) is a fundamental step in studies that perform genome wide expression profiling. Typically, DEG are identified by univariate approaches such as Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) or Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) for processing cDNA microarrays, and differential gene expression analysis based on the negative binomial distribution (DESeq) or Empirical analysis of Digital Gene Expression data in R (edgeR) for RNA-seq profiling.

Here researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai School present a new geometrical multivariate approach to identify DEG called the Characteristic Direction. They demonstrate that the Characteristic Direction method is significantly more sensitive than existing methods for identifying DEG in the context of transcription factor (TF) and drug perturbation responses over a large number of microarray experiments. They also benchmarked the Characteristic Direction method using synthetic data, as well as RNA-Seq data. A large collection of microarray expression data from TF perturbations (73 experiments) and drug perturbations (130 experiments) extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), as well as an RNA-Seq study that profiled genome-wide gene expression and STAT3 DNA binding in two subtypes of diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma, was used for benchmarking the method using real data.


The application of the Characteristic Direction method may shed new light on relevant biological mechanisms that would have remained undiscovered by the current state-of-the-art DEG methods.

Availability – The method is freely accessible via various open source code implementations using four popular programming languages: R, Python, MATLAB and Mathematica, all available at:

Clark NR, Hu KS, Feldmann AS, Kou Y, Chen EY, Duan Q, Ma Ayan A. (2014) The characteristic direction: a geometrical approach to identify differentially expressed genes. BMC Bioinformatics 15(1), 79. [abstract]
Scroll To Top