May

25

Transcriptome sequencing of lentil based on second-generation technology permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery

Filed Under Transcriptome Sequenced 

lentilLentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is a cool-season grain legume which provides a rich source of protein for human consumption. In terms of genomic resources, lentil is relatively underdeveloped, in comparison to other Fabaceae species, with limited available data. There is hence a significant need to enhance such resources in order to identify novel genes and alleles for molecular breeding to increase crop productivity and quality.

Tissue-specific cDNA samples from six distinct lentil genotypes were sequenced using Roche 454 GS-FLX Titanium technology, generating c. 1.38 x 106 expressed sequence tags (ESTs). De novo assembly generated a total of 15,354 contigs and 68,715 singletons. The complete unigene set was sequence-analysed against genome drafts of the model legume species Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana to identify 12,639, and 7,476 unique matches, respectively. When compared to the genome of soybean (Glycine max), a total of 20,419 unique hits were observed corresponding to c. 31% of the known gene space. A total of 25,592 lentil unigenes were subsequently annotated from GenBank. Simple sequence repeat (SSR)-containing ESTs were identified from consensus sequences and a total of 2,393 primer pairs were designed. A subset of 192 EST-SSR markers was screened for validation across a panel 12 cultivated lentil genotypes and one wild relative species. A total of 166 primer pairs obtained successful amplification, of which 47.5% detected genetic polymorphism.

A substantial collection of ESTs has been developed from sequence analysis of lentil genotypes using second-generation technology, permitting unigene definition across a broad range of functional categories. As well as providing resources for functional genomics studies, the unigene set has permitted significant enhancement of the number of publicly-available molecular genetic markers as tools for improvement of this species.

Sukhjiwan Kaur, Noel O.I. Cogan, Luke W. Pembleton, Maiko Shinozuka, Keith W. Savin, Michael Materne and John W. Forster. (2011) Transcriptome sequencing of lentil based on second-generation technology permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery. BMC Genomics 12, 265. [abstract]

Incoming search terms:

  • Lens culinaris
  • lens culinaris medik
  • lentils plant
  • illumina lentil
  • michael materne@gmail co­m
  • lentil genome sequencing powerpoint
  • lentil genome sequence
  • Lens esculenta
  • Lens culinaris breeding
  • photo lens culinaris

Comments

2 Responses to “Transcriptome sequencing of lentil based on second-generation technology permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery”

  1. Dimitris on November 19th, 2012 3:48 pm

    The paper is from 2011 not 2001. This really can mix up someone.Please fix it.

  2. admin on November 19th, 2012 3:54 pm

    Thanks for the correction. Sorry about the error.

Leave a Reply




  • Social Networking Pages

    Linkedin Group

  • Follow Me on Pinterest

  • RSS SEQanswers – RNA Sequencing

    • reason for low mapping rate?? May 23, 2013
      we did RNASeq using HiSeq 2000 100PE. When the data were back, I mapping them to the reference sequence, but got very low mapping rate (30-40%). I... […]
      miaom
    • cross-species data - questions about normalization May 23, 2013
      Hi, I have some data form various samples (cell types) in different species. I want to compare and analyze gene expression variability across the... […]
      trelek2
    • CuffDiff strange output May 23, 2013
      Hi, I hope that someone can be so gentle to help me. I'm analizing some data from RNA-Seq with TopHat and Cufflinks and I focus my attention on... […]
      Pruexel
    • cannot away with cuffdiff,incredible May 23, 2013
      Hi,all I have 4(A,B,C,D) sample in 4 times(increasing time),I got diff result in 3 different cuffdiff 1.cuffdiff 3(A,B,C) individual... […]
      upper
    • TopHat extremely low paired mapping rate. PLS HELP! May 22, 2013
      Hey guys, I have some problems with my paried-end RNA seq analysis on Galaxy. As you can see in the bam flagstat output, my tophat alignment rate is... […]
      Felix.Lee
    • Identifying small RNA sequence within whole genome sequence May 21, 2013
      Hi all, I want to know if there are any useful bioinformatic tool to find small RNA sequence within a whole bacteria genome. Thank you in... […]
      Inma

  • RSS Biostar – RNA-Seq

    • Why am I getting so many unmapped reads in STAR, classified as "too short"?
      I am currently using STAR to map several Hi-SEQ mRNA runs. I'm having trouble getting a decent amount of reads to map, but I don't really understand why. I'm hoping you can shed some light :) In the final log, only about 50% (or less) of the reads map to the reference. I'm using a GTF in addition to the genome. The unmapped bin that most […]
    • What are the best practices for SNP identification in RNA seq transcriptome data
      I have 20 RICE RNA seq tranascriptome data hiseq 2000 platform paired end reads. I aligned fasta reads with BWA and remove PCR duplicates with PICARD. Later I call SNP with samtools using various parameters. I would like to clarify what parameters should I used while alinging to reference rice genome for looking SNP location 100 bp upstream and 250 bp downst […]
    • How do TopHat options -g , --supress-hits, and Bowtie options interplay?
      Hi, I am currently using TopHat2 to map RNA-seq runs. I think there have been some changes pertaining the -g option. Does anyone know how it works now? I used to think that setting -g would look for n alignments for a given read, report them [if top-scoring] and discard those reads that had more than g [top scoring] alignments. Now, the description sounds mo […]
    • What happened to -k in TopHat for multiple-mapping reads?
      Selecting -g n in tophat does not discard reads mapping more than n, but instead only reports n alignments for those out all all their TOP scoring alignments. I think there used to be an option -k that would allow one to discard reads that topped x alignments -- whatever happened to that? I only see -g in the tophat 2 manual, no reporting options like before […]
    • Does tophat use the library-type information for mapping, or just for the XS flag?
      When I specify library-type to TopHat, i.e., first-strand, second-strand, unstranded, TopHat appends a value + or - to the XS:A flag, which is useful for subsequent analyses, such as annotation. However, does this information actually influence the "mappability" of reads, or is this unaffected? My thinking is that the information would be considere […]
    • Purpose of Y-shaped adapters in Illumina Sequencing?
      Hi all, Y adapters different sequences to be annealed to the 5' and 3' ends of each molecule in a library. The arms of the Y are unique, and the middle part, connected to the DNA fragment, is complementary. What are the advantages of this? My take of this over having fully-complementary adapters (ADAPTER1 - - - - - ADAPTER1) is that: -Upon primer a […]