For model species, the 3′ RNA-seq method might more accurately detect differential expression

One limitation of the widely used RNA-seq method is that long transcripts are represented by more reads than shorter transcripts, resulting in a biased estimation of expression levels. The 3′ RNA-seq method, which yields only one sequence per transcript, bypasses this limitation. Here, researchers from the University of São Paulo extracted RNA from two samples, in which we expected to find differentially expressed genes. Each was processed by both traditional and 3′ RNA-seq protocols. Both methods yielded similar differentially expressed genes and estimated expression levels in a comparable way, confirming they both represent valid tools for RNA-seq analysis. Notably, however, the researchers identified more differentially expressed transcripts with the 3′ RNA-seq method, suggesting a greater power to detect expression variation using this method. Hence, when little genomic information is available for the species studied, the standard RNA-seq presents a better cost-benefit compromise, whereas for model species, the 3′ RNA-seq method might more accurately detect differential expression.

Overview of the methods used to generate the RNA-seq libraries


(A) In the classic RNA-seq procedure, the RNA is fragmented and converted into cDNA using small primers of random sequence. (B) In the 3′ RNA-seq library, the mRNA molecules are randomly fragmented, generating fragments of different lengths. After fragmentation, only the 3′ portion of an mRNA molecule is selected using poly-T oligonucleotide baits attached to magnetic beads. The selected fragments (one per molecule) are then directionally sequenced.

Tandonnet S, Torres TT. (2016) Traditional versus 3′ RNA-seq in a non-model species. Genom Data 11:9-16. [article]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.