Microarray (MA) and high-throughput sequencing are two commonly used detection systems for global gene expression profiling. Although these two systems are frequently used in parallel, the differences in their final results had not to be examined thoroughly. Transcriptomic analysis of housekeeping (HK) genes provides a unique opportunity to reliably examine the technical difference between these two systems.
Researchers at Simon Fraser University investigated the structure, genome location, expression quantity, microarray probe coverage, as well as biological functions of differentially identified human HK genes by 9 MA and 6 sequencing studies. These in-depth analyses allowed the researchers to discover, for the first time, a subset of transcripts encoding membrane, cell surface and nuclear proteins that were prone to differential identification by the two platforms.
- Housekeeping genes can be used for reliable analysis of difference between microarray and sequencing technologies.
- Microarray tends to enrich gene ontology related to membrane, cell surface, and secreted proteins that are missed by sequencing.
- Sequencing tends to identify gene ontology related to nuclear transcripts that are missed by microarray.
- Both the probe coverage and detection sensitivity has contributed to the missing gene identification by microarray
- Sequencing technology has greatly improved current microarray probe coverage on the nuclear transcripts
The top-10 enriched gene ontology (GO) clusters (biological processes_FAT) of genes exclusively detected by MA, sequencing (PC > 0 and PC = 0), and the shared genes, respectively. The color represents value of –log P. Red sidebar highlights GO terms uniquely enriched in MA genes.