Breast cancer poses a substantial threat as it spreads to other organs, often lying in wait for years in these tissues and recurring without warning. Bones are a prime target, but the mechanisms that influence whether skeletal metastasis will develop or not remain poorly understood.
A collaboration between researchers at Cornell and the Max Planck Institute (MPI) of Colloids and Interfaces in Potsdam, Germany, used an innovative combination of biological and materials characterization tools to reveal that bones may actually grow in response to signals from a distant breast tumor – possibly as a preemptive defense mechanism against metastasis. The findings could point the way to future diagnostic tests and therapeutic treatments.
The paper’s co-lead authors are Aaron E. Chiou, Ph.D. ’20, currently a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and Chuang Liu with MPI.
The Cornell team was led by Claudia Fischbach, the Stanley Bryer 1946 Professor of Biomedical Engineering, whose lab focuses on understanding the biological and biophysical mechanisms that influence cancer development, progression and therapy response.
“Clinically, breast cancer spreads to bone quite frequently, but it’s not really well understood how it happens, and there aren’t many ways to predict it,” Chiou said. “We were interested in determining if there is a signature, or some way that we can detect changes in the bones prior to the formation of metastasis.”
Distant organs are made vulnerable to the spread of cancer when tumor cells secrete various signaling molecules, or factors, into the circulation. The researchers collected these factors and injected them into mice. Then they analyzed the mouse bones with a range of biological surveys, such as RNA sequencing, which can show how gene expression changes in bones, and other traditional pathology techniques. These methods didn’t reveal anything new or noteworthy, and normally the story would’ve ended there.
(A) Schematic of experimental design. TCM was prepared from cultures of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and then injected into 3-week-old female nude mice daily, for a period of 3 weeks. Bones (both tibiae and femora) were harvested and analyzed using complementary biological and physical sciences approaches. IP, intraperitoneal. Representative (B) hematoxylin&eosin (H&E)–stained histological cross sections of decalcified tibiae. (C) Heatmap of all genes analyzed via RNA-seq analysis of marrow-removed trabecular bone from femora (rows hierarchically clustered; see the Supplementary Materials for full size heatmap with dendrograms). Heatmap color/intensity represents the expression levels, as calculated by centering and scaling normalized count values in the row direction (per gene). (D) Volcano plot indicates which genes were significantly differentially expressed. Of 18,843 unique genes sequenced, 5 genes were differentially expressed (0.027% of total) with the criteria of adjusted P < 0.05 and log2 fold change >2. (E) Normalized counts for selected osteoclast- and osteoblast-specific genes (see the Supplementary Materials for additional bone-relevant genes). (n.s., adjusted P > 0.05). Representative (F) cathepsin K– and (G) procollagen I–stained histological cross sections of decalcified tibiae.
However, thanks to the materials expertise provided by the MPI team, led by the paper’s co-senior author Peter Fratzl, the researchers turned to a series of high-resolution imaging techniques – more common in the physical sciences – to scrutinize how the structure and composition of the bone’s microenvironment changed.
They used micro-computed tomography to study the bone architecture; Raman imaging to scan the bone’s chemical spectra; and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to reveal mineral properties. Most crucially, they employed a technique called dynamic histomorphometry, in which fluorescent dyes are integrated into the bone at different intervals and essentially create time stamps that show the rate of bone formation.
The researchers were surprised to find that bone exposed to a tumor’s secreted factors actually grew thicker by adding more layers of mineralized tissue at a faster pace.
Such a protective mechanism could have important applications in diagnostic analysis as well as for generating therapeutic treatments.
“This study demonstrates how engineering and physical sciences approaches are needed to really understand the full spectrum of changes that tumors might introduce to an organism,” said Fischbach, whose previous collaborations with Lara Estroff, professor of materials science and engineering, helped set the stage for the current study.
“This is something that wouldn’t have been possible if it wasn’t for the combination of interdisciplinary toolsets,” Fischbach said. “Biology alone wouldn’t have led us to these findings.”
The research was supported by the Human Frontier Science Program, which facilitated the international collaboration with a $1 million, three-year grant, and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Source – Cornell University