“We are improving the diagnostic capabilities of genomics, but sometimes genomics is not enough,” said Pankaj Agrawal, M.D., chief of the Division of Neonatology at the Miller School and Jackson Health System and senior author on the paper. “By bringing these other technologies into the mix, we can improve our ability to diagnose rare diseases and get answers for these families.”
Summary and Comparison of the key multi-omics branches

It highlights the information each detects, their advantages and disadvantages, and the types of patient cohorts they typically target.
In the review, Dr. Agrawal, also professor of pediatrics and genetics at the Miller School, and co-authors Sara Ali, M.D., a neonatal/perinatal fellow, and Qifei Li, Ph.D., a research assistant professor in the Miller School’s Department of Pediatrics, discuss how molecular diagnostics are rapidly evolving. Prior to next-generation sequencing (NGS), many families went through years-long diagnostic odysseys to figure out what was causing their child’s disease.
Over the past 20 years, NGS has revolutionized how medical teams diagnose rare childhood diseases. By pinpointing the exact genetic variations driving the disease, these tests can provide definitive diagnoses and, in some cases, offer patients access to effective treatments and clinical trials.
However, NGS does not always provide definitive answers. In some cases, these tests produce no results or identify variants of unknown significance (VUS): mutations that might – or might not – be causing the child’s disease.
To solve this problem, researchers and clinicians have been developing molecular tests that can, in some instances, provide actionable information.
“In select cases, we need to look beyond genomics and embrace multiomics,” said Dr. Agrawal. “These technologies are becoming more clinically available, and the literature shows they can improve our ability to diagnose these challenging cases.”
Cells go through a templated series of steps to get work done. DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA), which transfers the genetic code out of the cell’s nucleus. The mRNA is then translated into proteins, which implement the instructions encoded in the DNA. Each of these elements can go awry, so measuring them has become increasingly important.
Transcriptomics identifies mRNA levels, and its quality, in a sample. Sometimes there is not enough (or too much) mRNA for a specific gene, and that can cause problems. In addition, certain DNA changes can affect RNA splicing, which can be only identified by transcriptomic analysis.
Proteomics catalogues the proteins in a sample, which can help determine if these molecules are being produced at the appropriate levels or are being modified in pathogenic ways. Metabolomics measures metabolites, which are produced by chemical reactions in cells and can flag potential issues. Epigenetics helps identify whether specific genes are turned on or off. In some cases, the issue isn’t a mutation but rather how that gene is being regulated.
These technologies have been used in research labs for years and are now moving into the clinic. The same technologies that sequence DNA can also read RNA. In addition, clinical labs are springing up to provide epigenomic, proteomic and metabolomic insights for hospitals.
“It’s important that we leave no stones unturned for these patients,” said Dr. Agrawal. “If the genomic test is inconclusive, we have other technologies available to help get answers. There is significant research showing that multiomics is a viable path forward to help diagnose these kids and get them the care they need. We need to take advantage of every tool we have.”
Source – University of Miami
Transcriptomics, proteomics and other technologies could provide additional diagnostic power to help solve medical mysteries.
In a review published in the journal Pediatric Research, scientists at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine explored how several technologies can help diagnose rare diseases. In addition to genomics, which can identify the faulty genes that underlie many conditions, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics and metabolomics could provide important diagnostic information to help solve profound medical mysteries.
Summary and Comparison of the key multi-omics branches
It highlights the information each detects, their advantages and disadvantages, and the types of patient cohorts they typically target.
Genomics and Beyond
In the review, Dr. Agrawal, also professor of pediatrics and genetics at the Miller School, and co-authors Sara Ali, M.D., a neonatal/perinatal fellow, and Qifei Li, Ph.D., a research assistant professor in the Miller School’s Department of Pediatrics, discuss how molecular diagnostics are rapidly evolving. Prior to next-generation sequencing (NGS), many families went through years-long diagnostic odysseys to figure out what was causing their child’s disease.
Over the past 20 years, NGS has revolutionized how medical teams diagnose rare childhood diseases. By pinpointing the exact genetic variations driving the disease, these tests can provide definitive diagnoses and, in some cases, offer patients access to effective treatments and clinical trials.
However, NGS does not always provide definitive answers. In some cases, these tests produce no results or identify variants of unknown significance (VUS): mutations that might – or might not – be causing the child’s disease.
To solve this problem, researchers and clinicians have been developing molecular tests that can, in some instances, provide actionable information.
A Suite of Diagnostic Tools
Cells go through a templated series of steps to get work done. DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA), which transfers the genetic code out of the cell’s nucleus. The mRNA is then translated into proteins, which implement the instructions encoded in the DNA. Each of these elements can go awry, so measuring them has become increasingly important.
Transcriptomics identifies mRNA levels, and its quality, in a sample. Sometimes there is not enough (or too much) mRNA for a specific gene, and that can cause problems. In addition, certain DNA changes can affect RNA splicing, which can be only identified by transcriptomic analysis.
Proteomics catalogues the proteins in a sample, which can help determine if these molecules are being produced at the appropriate levels or are being modified in pathogenic ways. Metabolomics measures metabolites, which are produced by chemical reactions in cells and can flag potential issues. Epigenetics helps identify whether specific genes are turned on or off. In some cases, the issue isn’t a mutation but rather how that gene is being regulated.
These technologies have been used in research labs for years and are now moving into the clinic. The same technologies that sequence DNA can also read RNA. In addition, clinical labs are springing up to provide epigenomic, proteomic and metabolomic insights for hospitals.
Source – University of Miami
Ali SS, Li Q, Agrawal PB. (2024) Implementation of multi-omics in diagnosis of pediatric rare diseases. Pediatr Res [Epub ahead of print]. [article]
Related Posts
Heart failure reshapes bone marrow to create inflammation-related immune memory
Overlooked DNA regions surrounding ‘microexons’ hold missing pieces of autism’s genetic puzzle
An anti-senescence gene may fight spinal disc deterioration
Scientists identify the neuroblastoma cells that signal poor outcomes
Urine test may improve bladder cancer diagnosis and guide treatment decisions
Tracing 700 million years of cell evolution
RNA-Seq reveals a new way the developing heart controls its growth
Nanopore direct RNA sequencing reveals the challenges of detecting RNA modifications
The Human RNome Project Consortium seeks to publish first-ever complete sequence of the body’s RNA
Unmasking “zombie cells” in aging tissue with an AI-powered barcode
RNA variant imaging for cancer diagnosis
Autism-risk mutations reveal two opposing patterns of brain gene activity
Avoiding a sticky situation: how cells stop messenger RNAs from clumping together
RNA Sequencing identifies new tick-borne virus that causes flu-like illness
Single-cell RNA sequencing links genetic mutations to cell behavior in cancer
Worm’s radical transformation shows metamorphosis can change the functions of cells
RNA sequencing reveals functional chimeric mRNAs in mammalian immunity
Atlas of the brain’s striatum could guide researchers to new drug treatments
Immune cells offer insights on billion-dollar virus
A functionally integrated cross-tissue alternative splicing program during short-term calorie restriction
Transcriptomics, proteomics and other technologies could provide additional diagnostic power to help solve medical mysteries.
In a review published in the journal Pediatric Research, scientists at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine explored how several technologies can help diagnose rare diseases. In addition to genomics, which can identify the faulty genes that underlie many conditions, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics and metabolomics could provide important diagnostic information to help solve profound medical mysteries.
Summary and Comparison of the key multi-omics branches
It highlights the information each detects, their advantages and disadvantages, and the types of patient cohorts they typically target.
Genomics and Beyond
In the review, Dr. Agrawal, also professor of pediatrics and genetics at the Miller School, and co-authors Sara Ali, M.D., a neonatal/perinatal fellow, and Qifei Li, Ph.D., a research assistant professor in the Miller School’s Department of Pediatrics, discuss how molecular diagnostics are rapidly evolving. Prior to next-generation sequencing (NGS), many families went through years-long diagnostic odysseys to figure out what was causing their child’s disease.
Over the past 20 years, NGS has revolutionized how medical teams diagnose rare childhood diseases. By pinpointing the exact genetic variations driving the disease, these tests can provide definitive diagnoses and, in some cases, offer patients access to effective treatments and clinical trials.
However, NGS does not always provide definitive answers. In some cases, these tests produce no results or identify variants of unknown significance (VUS): mutations that might – or might not – be causing the child’s disease.
To solve this problem, researchers and clinicians have been developing molecular tests that can, in some instances, provide actionable information.
A Suite of Diagnostic Tools
Cells go through a templated series of steps to get work done. DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA), which transfers the genetic code out of the cell’s nucleus. The mRNA is then translated into proteins, which implement the instructions encoded in the DNA. Each of these elements can go awry, so measuring them has become increasingly important.
Transcriptomics identifies mRNA levels, and its quality, in a sample. Sometimes there is not enough (or too much) mRNA for a specific gene, and that can cause problems. In addition, certain DNA changes can affect RNA splicing, which can be only identified by transcriptomic analysis.
Proteomics catalogues the proteins in a sample, which can help determine if these molecules are being produced at the appropriate levels or are being modified in pathogenic ways. Metabolomics measures metabolites, which are produced by chemical reactions in cells and can flag potential issues. Epigenetics helps identify whether specific genes are turned on or off. In some cases, the issue isn’t a mutation but rather how that gene is being regulated.
These technologies have been used in research labs for years and are now moving into the clinic. The same technologies that sequence DNA can also read RNA. In addition, clinical labs are springing up to provide epigenomic, proteomic and metabolomic insights for hospitals.
Source – University of Miami
Ali SS, Li Q, Agrawal PB. (2024) Implementation of multi-omics in diagnosis of pediatric rare diseases. Pediatr Res [Epub ahead of print]. [article]
Related Posts
Heart failure reshapes bone marrow to create inflammation-related immune memory
Overlooked DNA regions surrounding ‘microexons’ hold missing pieces of autism’s genetic puzzle
An anti-senescence gene may fight spinal disc deterioration
Scientists identify the neuroblastoma cells that signal poor outcomes
Urine test may improve bladder cancer diagnosis and guide treatment decisions
Tracing 700 million years of cell evolution
RNA-Seq reveals a new way the developing heart controls its growth
Nanopore direct RNA sequencing reveals the challenges of detecting RNA modifications
The Human RNome Project Consortium seeks to publish first-ever complete sequence of the body’s RNA
Unmasking “zombie cells” in aging tissue with an AI-powered barcode
RNA variant imaging for cancer diagnosis
Autism-risk mutations reveal two opposing patterns of brain gene activity
Avoiding a sticky situation: how cells stop messenger RNAs from clumping together
RNA Sequencing identifies new tick-borne virus that causes flu-like illness
Single-cell RNA sequencing links genetic mutations to cell behavior in cancer
Worm’s radical transformation shows metamorphosis can change the functions of cells
RNA sequencing reveals functional chimeric mRNAs in mammalian immunity
Atlas of the brain’s striatum could guide researchers to new drug treatments
Immune cells offer insights on billion-dollar virus
A functionally integrated cross-tissue alternative splicing program during short-term calorie restriction
Stay Connected
Submit a Post to the Blog
Recent Posts
Subscribe to the RNA-Seq Blog
RNA-Seq Products & Services